Buy (2000 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
A technique for employing computed tomography of the jaws to examine the dimensions and locations of the apical bases of the jaws
Abstract
For many years, the study of apical bases has been important to orthodontics; lateral cephalograms and jaw models were used in the research. Without three-dimensional studies, dentistry would not be conceivable today. These studies enable one to examine an object from any perspective and show even the smallest alterations to the anatomical features of the studied region. The apical bases of the jaws can be studied using cone beam computed tomography, which allows for an examination of the structure that forms the bases as well as their size, shape, and location. We are able to examine the apical base's breadth, length, and angle of inclination on individual CBCT sections thanks to the characteristics we suggested. The suggested analysis's clinical application will help with more thorough and precise orthodontic treatment planning.
About the Authors
A. B. Slabkovskaya
ФГБОУ ВО «Российский университет медицины», НОИ стоматологии им. А. И. Евдокимова, кафедра ортодонтии
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. M. Sevan
ФГБОУ ВО «Российский университет медицины», НОИ стоматологии им. А. И. Евдокимова, кафедра ортодонтии
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. N. Sevan
ООО «Сириус»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L. S. Persin
ФГБОУ ВО «Российский университет медицины», НОИ стоматологии им. А. И. Евдокимова, кафедра ортодонтии
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Давыдов Б. Н. и др. Вариативность морфометрических показателей апикального базиса верхней челюсти у людей с физиологическими видами прикуса. Ч. I. М.:Институт стоматологии. 2021;4:58–60.
2. Егиязарян А. Л. Оценка морфометрического состояния зубочелюстной системы у лиц с физиологической и дистальной окклюзией зубных рядов с применением информационно-компьютерных технологий: дис. ... канд. мед. наук. М.: МГМСУ. 2013.
3. Ищенко Е. А. Способ измерения апикального базиса: Патент RU № 2 709 684, действ. с 11.06.2019.
4. Кирсанова Е. В. и др. Диагностика в ортодонтии. СПБ.: СЗГМУ им. И. И. Мечникова. 2017. С. 20–39.
5. Персин Л. С. и др. Ортодонтия. Диагностика и лечение зубочелюстных аномалий и деформаций. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2015. С. 16–23.
6. Персин Л. С. Ортодонтия. Современные методы диагностики аномалий зубов,зубных рядов и окклюзий. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2017. С. 15–42.
7. Персин Л. С. Ортодонтия. Национальое руководство. Т. 1. Диагностика зубочелюстных аномалий. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2020. С. 25–42.
8. Рогацкин Д. В. Современная компьютерная томография для стоматологии. М.: Институт стоматологии. 2010. С. 121–123.
9. Ackerman M. Enhancement Orthodontics Theory and Practice. U.S.A.: Blackwell Munsgaard. 2010. P. 5–45.
10. Ahmed M., Shaikh A., Fida M. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern // Dental Press J Orthod. 2018;23(5):75–81.
11. Cantatore A., Muller P. Introduction to computed tomography. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark. 2011. P.25–32.
12. Cohenca N. Clinical applications of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics: A comprehensive review // Germany : Quintessence international. 2015;6:465–478.
13. Damstra J. et al. Practical limitations of cone-beam computed tomography in 3D cephalometry // China : Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2011;20(6):662–628.
14. Dobai A. et al. Di Paolo's cephalometrical analysis of lower face by means of Cone-Beam CT // Hungary : Fogorv Sz. 2016;109(2):39–44.
15. Dobai A. et al. Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study // Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;21(2):207–218.
16. Doshi J. R., Jain P., Jain M., Rathore A. S., Gaikwad R. N., Nallamilli L. S. Mount Vernon Index vs Yen Angle for Assessment of Anteroposterior Apical Jaw Base Relationship // Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(1):35–38.
17. 3D Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics. U.S.A.: Springer. 2021. P. 24–32.
18. Haddad S., Kerbrat J. B., Schouman T., Goudot P. Impact de la diminution du périmètre des arcades dentaires lors d’une prise en charge orthodontique dans le développement des voies aériennes supérieures. Une revue de la littérature [Effect of dental arch length decrease during orthodontic treatment in the upper airway development. A review] // Orthod Fr. 2017;88(1):25–33.
19. Janson G., Aliaga-Del Castillo A., Niederberger A. Changes in apical base sagittal relationship in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without premolar extractions: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Angle Orthod. 2017;87(2):338–355.
20. Jena A. K., Nayyer N., Sharan J., Behera B. K., Marya A. Geometrical Approaches for the Accurate Identification of Normal Vertical Positions of Sella and Nasion Points in Cephalograms. U.K. : Int J Dent. 2022. P. 39–44.
21. Ka-lun Li T. Computed tomography in dentistry // U.K.:.Dental Bulletin. 2011;13:4–6.
22. Khambete N., Kumar R. Computed tomography in dentistry // Germany: Lamb Acad public. 2012. P. 145– 158.
23. Kong L., Liu Y., Zhou X., He H., Liu Z. Responsiveness of three measurements in cone-beam computed tomography transverse analyses during both tooth-supported and mini-screw-assisted rapid maxillary expansion // Angle Orthod. 2024;94(1):39–50.
24. Patel K. S., Kulkarni N., Singh V. P., Parikh K. Identification of an Alternate Maxillary Apical Base Landmark from Pre-existing Substitutions // Acta Inform Med. 2014;22(5):347–349.
25. Prasad M. еt al. Establishment of norms of the beta angle to assess the sagittal discrepancy for Nellore district population // U.K. : J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4(2):409–413.
26. Sarment D. Cone Beam Computed Tomography. U.S.A.: Blackwell Munsgaard. 2014. P.10–19.
27. Singh R. R., Verma P., Pradhan D., Bhardwaj R., Kour S. Association between maxillary and mandibular apical base lengths and severity of dental crowding or spacing in Class II malocclusion subjects: An in-vitro study // J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(1):49–54.
28. Sundareswaran S., Kumar V. Reliability of Beta angle in assessing true anteroposterior apical base discrepancy in different growth patterns // J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(1):125–130.
29. Tamimi D. Specialty Imaging: Temporomandibular Joint // U.K. : Elsevier Science. 2016. P. 45–60.
30. Wang R. Three-dimensional cephalometry for orthognathic planning: Normative data and analyses // Hungary: J Formos Med Associat. 2020;119(1 Pt 2): 191–203.
Review
For citations:
Slabkovskaya A.B., Sevan S.M., Sevan M.N., Persin L.S. A technique for employing computed tomography of the jaws to examine the dimensions and locations of the apical bases of the jaws. Orthodontia. 2024;(2):3-10. (In Russ.)
Views:
147
Email this article 