Preview

Orthodontia

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A comparison of two- and one-stage guided tissue regeneration approaches Summary in orthodontic therapy

Abstract

Relevance. Changes in periodontal tissues accompany orthodontic tooth movement, and if treatment planning and prognosis are not adequately comprehensive, problems may result. To increase the potential of orthodontics when there is insufficient bone and gingival volume, augmentation procedures are employed.

Purpose of the study: The goal of this study is to examine two-stage and one-stage approaches for increasing the periodontal phenotype.

Materials and Methods. PGingival recession depth, vestibula depth, attached gingival breadth, and colorimetric probes were used to assess patients' periodontal biotype. Axial and sagittal projections of CBCT were assessed at 3, 6, and 8 mm from the cementoenamel junctio n (CES).

Results. Following both procedures, the gingival biotype altered; the one-stage technique produced a medium gingival biotype, whereas the two-stage technique produced a thick gingival biotype. The thickness of the vestibular bone plate can expand by up to 2 mm at one stage and by up to 2 mm and more at two stages when bone volume and gingival thickness increase.

Conclusions. One-stage augmentation of gingiva and bone tissue can shorten treatment duration, minimize discomfort, and minimize problems.

About the Authors

M. Yu. Dorzhiyeva
ФГБОУ ВО «Российский университет медицины», кафедра пропедевтики терапевтической стоматологии
Россия


G. S. Runova
ФГБОУ ВО «Российский университет медицины», кафедра пропедевтики терапевтической стоматологии
Россия


О. Янушевич
ФГБОУ ВО «Российский университет медицины», кафедра пропедевтики терапевтической стоматологии
Россия


References

1. Alsalhi R.H., Tabasum S.T. Prevalence of gingival recession and its correlation with gingival phenotype in mandibular incisors region of orthodontically treated female patients: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021;25(4):341–346.

2. Alsulaimani L., Qali M. Relationship Between Cone-Beam CT Evaluation and Clinical Evaluation Before and After Orthodontic Treatment and the Rate of Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024;16(6):62536.

3. Brugnami F., Caiazzo A., Signorelli L., Capri D. Regenerative Orthodontics: GBR and Corticotomy to Stretch the Limits of Orthodontic Treatment. Int J Period Rest Dent. 2021;41(1):105–111.

4. Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M., Castro A.B., Danneels M., Schelfhout A., Teughels W., Willems G. Risk factors for gingival recessions after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2023;45(5):528–544.

5. Chen M., Chen X., Sun L., Zhao B., Liu Y. Sequential soft- and hard-tissue augmentation after clear alignermediated adjustment of traumatic occlusion: A case report. J Am Dent Assoc. 2022;153(6):572–581.

6. Coşkun İ., Kaya B. Appraisal of the relationship between tooth inclination, dehiscence, fenestration, and sagittal skeletal pattern with cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(4):544–551.

7. Jepsen K., Sculean A., Jepsen S. Complications and treatment errors involving periodontal tissues related to orthodontic therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2023;92(1):135–158.

8. Luchian I., Surlari Z., Goriuc A., Ioanid N., Zetu I., Butnaru O., Scutariu M.M., Tatarciuc M., Budala D.G. The Influence of Orthodontic Treatment on Periodontal Health between Challenge and Synergy: A Narrative Review. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(4):112.


Review

For citations:


Dorzhiyeva M.Yu., Runova G.S.,   A comparison of two- and one-stage guided tissue regeneration approaches Summary in orthodontic therapy. Orthodontia. 2025;(3):18-24. (In Russ.)

Views: 48

JATS XML

ISSN 2224-7068 (Print)