Buy (2000 RUB)
Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Evaluation Method of Treatment Outcome Based on Superimposition of CBCT Before and After in Class II Patients Treated with IZS Screws
Abstract
In orthodontic practice, cone-beam computed tomography, or CBCT, is a crucial diagnostic technique. It is possible to assess how bone structures change over time following therapy by superimposing CBCT pictures. To avoid errors caused by shifting bone marker positions, CBCT images can be superimposed using certain algorithms. In this paper, we outline a technique for superimposing (overlaying) CBCT pictures of patients before to and following subzygomatic screw orthodontic therapy.
About the Authors
E. A. Gizoyeva
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Arkhangelsk
K. A. Gasparyan
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Arkhangelsk
A. A. Simakova
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Arkhangelsk
A. V. Suhaovskaya
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Arkhangelsk
E. A. Pyatisheva
Northern State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Arkhangelsk
References
1. Almeida M.R. Biomechanics of extra-alveolar mini-implants // Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2019;24:93–109.
2. Bolla E., Muratore F., Carano A., Bowman S.J. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods // The angle orthodontist. 2002;72(5):481–494.
3. Burstone C., Smith R. Mechanics of tooth movement // Am J OrthodDentofacOrthop. 1984;81:224–227.
4. Carano A., Velo S., Leone P., Siciliani G. Clinical applications of the miniscrew anchorage system // J clinorthod. JCO 2005;39(1):9.
5. Chang C.C.H., Lin J.S.Y., Yeh H.Y. Extra-Alveolar Bone Screws for Conservative correction of severe malocclusion without extractions or orthognathic surgery // Current osteoporosis reports. 2018;16(4):387–394.
6. Ferguson D.J., Carano A., Bowman S.J., Davis E.C., Gutierrez Vega M.E., Lee S.H. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet // W JOrthod. 2005;6(4).
7. Halazonetis D.J. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans // Am J OrthodDentofacOrthoped. 2005;127(5):627–637.
8. Keim R.G., Berkman C. Intra-arch maxillary molar distalization appliances for Class II correction // J Clin Orthod. JCO 2004;38(9):505–511.
9. Kinzinger G., Wehrbein H., Byloff F.K., Yildizhan F., Diedrich P. Innovative anchorage alternatives for molar distalizationan overview // J OrofacOrthoped/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2005;66(5):397–413.
10. Ponce-Garcia C., de Oliveira Ruellas A.C., Cevidanes L.H.S., Flores-Mir C., Carey J.P., Lagravere-Vich M. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients // Head & face medicine. 2020;16(1):1–20.
11. Upadhyay M., Yadav S., Nanda R. Biomechanical basis of extraction space closure // Esthetics and Biomechanics in Orthodontics. 2012;108.
12. Weissheimer A., Menezes L.M., Koerich L., Pham J., Cevidanes L.H.S. Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation // Int J oral and maxillofac surg. 2015;44(9):1188–1196.
13. Yatabe M., Prieto J.C., Styner M., Zhu H., Ruellas A.C., Paniagua B., Budin F., Benavides E., Shoukri B., Michoud L. 3D superimposition of craniofacial imaging. The utility of multicentre collaborations // Orthod&CraniofacRes. 2019;22:213–220.
Review
For citations:
Gizoyeva E.A., Gasparyan K.A., Simakova A.A., Suhaovskaya A.V., Pyatisheva E.A. Evaluation Method of Treatment Outcome Based on Superimposition of CBCT Before and After in Class II Patients Treated with IZS Screws. Orthodontia. 2025;(2):46-52. (In Russ.)
Views:
27
Email this article 